background
Welcome to Wall Street Prep! Use code at checkout for 15% off.
Wharton & Wall Street Prep Certificates
Now Enrolling for February 2025 for September 2024
:
Private EquityReal Estate InvestingFP&A
Wharton & Wall Street Prep Certificates:
Enrollment for February 2025 is Open
Wall Street Prep

Market Pricing Maxim (MPM)

The question of whether markets are "efficient" or not is not merely an academic discussion

Join 750k+ learners today. Learn online from Wall Street Prep — the training firm that prepares new hires at the world's top financial institutions.

Enroll Today
  Table of Contents

Market Pricing Maxim: Economic Logic in Valuation

Anyone who has done valuation for very long, whether via discounted cash flow models or comparables, realizes that there is a host of assumptions behind the mechanics of the analysis. Some of these assumptions are based on straightforward economic logic.

For example, if the returns we expect on our investment exceed our opportunity cost of capital (i.e., what we could have earned doing the next best thing), then we’ve created economic value for ourselves (which can easily be expressed as a positive NPV). If not, we have misallocated our capital.

Or, for example, the less uncertainty we bear with regard to receiving our returns (i.e., higher probability of receiving the cash flows), all else being equal, the more highly we will value them (i.e., we will discount them less). Thus, debt has a lower “cost” than equity for the same firm.

Limitations of Economic Logic in Understanding Market Pricing

But economic logic only takes us so far. When it comes to many of the assumptions in our models (e.g. the DCF), we look to historical data, either from the capital markets or the economy as a whole. Common examples include:

  • Using the historical nominal GDP growth as a proxy for terminal growth rate.
  • Calculating a firm’s current market capitalization/total capitalization as a proxy for its future capital structure for the purpose of estimating WACC.
  • Using market prices to estimate a firm’s cost of equity (i.e., the CAPM).

Naturally, these latter assumptions, all of which rely on empirical and historical data from the markets, prompt us to ask: How reliable are the data as benchmarks for valuation? Whether markets are “efficient” or not is not merely an academic discussion.

Market Pricing Maxim (MPM) vs. Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH)

I recently had an interesting correspondence with Michael Rozeff, Professor Emeritus of Finance at the University at Buffalo, on some of these very issues. He shared with me a paper he published online critiquing the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) and offering an alternative view, called the Market Pricing Maxim (MPM). I wanted to share it here with our readers:

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=906564

In the future, I plan to further discuss the concepts behind many of our assumptions (particularly with regard to the cost of capital), unpacking the logic behind them and asking how it lines up with economic reality, in the same spirit that Professor Rozeff does in his paper on efficient markets.

The Wharton Online
& Wall Street Prep
Buy-Side Investing Certificate Program

Fast track your career as a hedge fund or equity research professional. Enrollment is open for the Feb. 10 - Apr. 6 cohort.

Enroll Today

The Wall Street Prep Quicklesson Series

7 Free Financial Modeling Lessons

Get instant access to video lessons taught by experienced investment bankers. Learn financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel shortcuts.