What is LTV/CAC?
The LTV/CAC Ratio measures the relationship between the lifetime value of a customer and the cost incurred to acquire that customer.
The customer lifetime value (LTV) refers to the profit attributable to a particular customer, while the customer acquisition cost (CAC) is the expense incurred in convincing the customer to purchase the product (i.e., convert into a paying customer).
- LTV/CAC ratio is a SaaS KPI that compares Lifetime Value (LTV) and Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC).
- Lifetime value (LTV) is the estimated profit generated by an average customer, while the customer acquisition cost (CAC) represents the expense incurred to acquire that customer.
- LTV/CAC ratio matters most for early-stage SaaS companies, as the KPI provides insights into the cost efficiency of their sales and marketing (S&M) spending, which can determine the sustainability of their business models.
- The standard benchmark for the ideal LTV/CAC ratio is around 3.0x in the SaaS industry.
- If the LTV to CAC ratio is below 1.0x, that implies there are challenges in monetizing new customers, while a ratio above 5.0x indicates the company might need to pivot and prioritize growth.
- A low LTV/CAC ratio could be attributed to ineffective budgeting, an unclear target market, or a broad strategy that is not profitable.
- LTV is influenced by the retention rate, gross margin, and ARPA (Average Revenue Per Account), while CAC is influenced by factors like marketing efficiency and sales efficiency.
Table of Contents
- How to Calculate LTV/CAC Ratio
- LTV/CAC Ratio Formula
- What is Good LTV:CAC Ratio in the SaaS Industry?
- How to Improve LTV to CAC Ratio
- What Factors Cause Low LTV-CAC Ratio (<1.0x)?
- How to Perform Cohort Analysis Using LTV to CAC Ratio
- LTV/CAC Ratio Calculator — Excel Template
- 1. Lifetime Value (LTV) Calculation Example
- 2. ARPA Calculation Example
- 3. Margin Multiple Calculation Example (LTV Discount Rate)
- 4. Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) Calculation Example
- 5. LTV/CAC Ratio Calculation Example
- 6. Alternative LTV to CAC Calculation Example
How to Calculate LTV/CAC Ratio
The LTV/CAC ratio stands for “Lifetime Value to Customer Acquisition Cost” and is perhaps the important metric for evaluating software-as-a-service (SaaS) companies.
In practice, the LTV/CAC ratio is most often used to gauge a SaaS company’s cost efficiency in terms of its sales and marketing (S&M) spending, which ultimately determines its long-term feasibility of its current business model.
Simply put, the LTV to CAC ratio answers, “Are the current customer acquisition strategies of the SaaS business sustainable?”
Traditional GAAP reporting standards fall short in depicting the financial performance of these software companies accurately. Hence, the SaaS industry collectively relies on its own set of metrics to help bridge the disconnect between GAAP and non-GAAP metrics.
While the LTV:CAC ratio is most frequently used to analyze early-stage SaaS companies, the scope of its usage extends to any type of business with repeat purchases, such as e-commerce and direct-to-consumer (DTC) companies.
To optimize the LTV:CAC ratio, a SaaS company must maximize lifetime value (LTV) and minimize customer acquisition costs (CAC), while ensuring the impact on the retention rate is marginal (i.e. customer churn does not offset the benefits).
The LTV/CAC ratio is computed by dividing the total sales (or gross margin) attributable to a customer over their entire lifetime (LTV) by the total cost incurred to initially convince that same customer or customer group to make their first purchase (CAC).
- Step 1 ➝
LTV/CAC Ratio Formula
The formula to calculate the LTV/CAC ratio divides the customer lifetime value (LTV) by the customer acquisition cost (CAC).
Where:
- Customer Lifetime Value (CLV) = (ARPA × Gross Margin) ÷ Churn Rate
- Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) = Σ Sales and Marketing (S&M) Expenses ÷ Number of New Customers Acquired
Conceptually, the LTV to CAC ratio measures the return on investment (ROI) of each dollar that the company spent in order to acquire that customer initially.
By comparing the lifetime value (LTV) and customer acquisition cost (CAC) to one together, the LTV:CAC ratio effectively shows whether the expenses incurred to acquire customers are worth the economic value received in return from said customers.
For the business model of a SaaS company and customer acquisition strategy to be repeatable and feasible over the long run, the profits derived from customers must be in excess of the costs associated with acquiring them.
If not, the SaaS company’s business model is not sustainable over the long haul, and would only be a matter of time before
What is Good LTV:CAC Ratio in the SaaS Industry?
For early-stage SaaS companies, the general guidelines for a “good” LTV/CAC ratio are as follows.
LTV:CAC Ratio | Interpretation |
---|---|
LTV/CAC ➝ ~3.0x |
|
LTV/CAC ➝ <1.0x |
|
LTV/CAC ➝ >5.0x |
|
How to Improve LTV to CAC Ratio
Often, it is normal for CACs to start out on the lower end as the target market and customer acquisition strategy were intentionally left open-ended.
The start-up should ideally be able to make the proper adjustments post-feedback and insights collected from customer data as it matures and enters the growth-stage.
A sign of progress in the right direction is reflected in the LTV/CAC ratio converging towards 3.0x – which represents a more normalized, sustainable rate.
Otherwise, the unsustainable cash burn rate will eventually catch up to the company as it soon runs out of the funds raised (and investors become reluctant to offer more capital).
While there are well-funded companies that can burn through their cash reserves at rather rapid paces, certain companies can continue raising capital—often from growth equity funds—because of the following factors:
- Product-Market Fit (PMF) ➝ The product concept and the business model has been relatively validated via market traction.
- Upside Potential ➝ The LTV/CAC ratio might be lower than the target range; nevertheless, the market and revenue opportunity seems compelling enough for existing or new investors (i.e. lack of funding is holding back growth).
- Competition ➝ The reason behind the spending pace might be due to the increased competition and funding of similar start-ups, which again validates the product concept (e.g., Uber Eats vs. Grubhub / Seamless vs. DoorDash)
Or, if a start-up does not seem to be spending sufficiently, this could suggest that either growth opportunities in the industry are scarce or management is being overly conservative with spending, which places the start-up at the risk of trailing behind its competitors in the market.
What Factors Cause Low LTV-CAC Ratio (<1.0x)?
An LTV/CAC ratio of 1.0x means the company is right at the break-even point – but note, CAC excludes expenses unrelated to acquiring customers. That said, an LTV/CAC below 1.0x means the company is failing to break even.
Starting out, if the LTV/CAC ratio is too low, there are adjustments that must be implemented before attempting to scale. Upon closer examination, the start-up could be making the mistakes of:
- Ineffective Budgeting ➝ For example, a sizable portion of the budget may be spent in less effective S&M channels, whilst the under-funded campaigns are bringing in most of the new customers
- Unclear Target Market ➝ Targeting markets composed of inadequate product demand leads to poor traction and revenue growth, as expenses continue to accumulate
- Broad Strategy ➝ Being too broad in the sales strategy and market segmentation often coincides with the inefficient allocation of capital (i.e., low return on investment)
In other cases, the LTV/CAC ratio might start out near 3.0x but decline as the market matures. The downtrend suggests the competitive landscape has become saturated with new entrants, making the acquisition of new customers more difficult (and costlier).
And then in the worst-case scenario, an LTC/CAC ratio consistently on the lower end despite constant modifications points towards the potential of there being a more concerning underlying issue (e.g., the lack of product-market fit, an unmonetizable end-market).